Anti-racist school program found to have no negative impact on children’s stress levels, study reveals

Understanding the Anti-Racist School Program

In a recent study conducted by researchers from North Carolina State University, Duke University, and Dickinson College, the effectiveness of an anti-racist program in high schools was examined. The aim of the program was to enhance conversations about race and racial justice within the school community. Contrary to concerns that such programs might cause stress or alienation among students, the study found that the anti-racist intervention did not result in negative emotional outcomes for the participants.

The study involved a partnership with a public high school, where a 10-week classroom intervention was implemented for 45 minutes each week. The intervention focused on helping students understand and discuss issues related to racism. Before and after the intervention, assessments were conducted on 227 students to gauge their level of engagement, relationship with staff, sense of belonging, stress levels, and perceptions of social inequality. Additionally, 67 participants completed daily surveys during the intervention period to track fluctuations in stress levels and feelings of belonging.

Evidence of Positive Impact

One of the key findings of the study was that a significant portion of the students reported high engagement with the intervention, demonstrating a keen interest in learning about and discussing racism-related issues. The highly engaged group showed notable growth in their awareness of social inequality following the intervention. Importantly, the study revealed that there was no increase in stress levels or decrease in feelings of belonging on days when students were actively involved in the anti-racism intervention, regardless of their level of engagement.

Related Video

The research also refuted the misconception that anti-racist programming in schools could be detrimental to students. In fact, the study indicated that students actually benefited from the program, with no evidence of increased stress or adverse effects on their sense of belonging within the school community. This positive outcome challenges the notion that addressing racism in educational settings is inherently stressful for students.

Importance of Partnerships and Real-Time Data

The study emphasized the value of collaborations between educators and the research community in evaluating the effectiveness of anti-racist interventions. By collecting real-world data on student responses to such programs, the research provided valuable insights for teachers and expanded the understanding of how students engage with anti-racist initiatives. Particularly noteworthy was the use of daily surveys to capture student experiences in real-time, offering a more nuanced understanding of the intervention’s effects.

The findings of this study suggest that partnerships between researchers and educators can enhance the implementation and evaluation of interventions aimed at promoting racial justice in schools. By incorporating multiple assessment methods and capturing student engagement levels, future research can further explore the impact of anti-racist programs and other educational interventions, such as those focusing on mental health or academic skills.

Implications for Future Research and Education

The study published in the journal AERA Open serves as a model for evaluating the effectiveness of anti-racist curricula in schools. By demonstrating that such programs do not cause stress or alienation among students, the research paves the way for broader adoption of anti-racist interventions in educational settings. The results underscore the importance of creating inclusive and conversation-friendly environments that empower students to engage with issues of racial justice.

Moving forward, educators and researchers are encouraged to continue exploring innovative approaches to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in schools. By building on the findings of this study and fostering collaborations between academia and practice, the field of education can further advance efforts to address systemic inequalities and promote social justice within school communities. The success of the anti-racist program evaluated in this study highlights the potential for transformative change through intentional and evidence-based interventions.

Links to additional Resources:

1. www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2023/02/anti-racist-programs-not-stressful 2. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9888586/ 3. www.edutopia.org/article/study-anti-racist-program-schools-doesnt-stress-kids/. 

Related Wikipedia Articles

Topics: Anti-racism in education, Racial justice in schools, School-based interventions

Anti-racism
Anti-racism encompasses a range of ideas and political actions which are meant to counter racial prejudice, systemic racism, and the oppression of specific racial groups. Anti-racism is usually structured around conscious efforts and deliberate actions which are intended to create equal opportunities for all people on both an individual and...
Read more: Anti-racism

Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007), also known as the PICS case, is a United States Supreme Court case which found it unconstitutional for a school district to use race as a factor in assigning students to schools in order to...
Read more: Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1

Anti-social behaviour
Antisocial behaviours (sometimes called dissocial behaviours) are actions which are considered to violate the rights of or otherwise harm others by committing crime or nuisance, such as stealing and physical attack or noncriminal behaviours such as lying and manipulation. It is considered to be disruptive to others in society. This...
Read more: Anti-social behaviour