Conservative child care placements outpace Labour's

Spread the love

Conservative child care placements rise faster than Labour’s. In England, over 80,000 children are now in care, an increase of nearly one third since 2010. We’ve discovered that local party politics is a factor in this. Our analysis shows that, between 2015 and 2021, six or seven more children each year were taken into care in an average sized Conservative council than in an equivalent Labour council.

Political Affiliation and Child Care Placements: Conservative Councils and the Rise in Child Care Placements

Related Video

Published on: August 18, 2021 Description: Wellington-Halton Hills incumbent MP Michael Chong says the Liberal government's $10/day childcare plan will not work. Melissa ...

Local Conservative candidate talks child care

In England, the number of children in care has seen a significant rise, with over 80,000 children now in care, marking a nearly one-third increase since 2010. This concerning trend has prompted researchers to investigate the factors contributing to this increase, and their findings reveal that local party politics plays a role.

Conservative Councils and the Rise in Child Care Placements

Analysis conducted between 2015 and 2021 indicates that Conservative councils, on average, placed six or seven more children in care each year compared to Labour councils of similar size. This suggests that the political affiliation of local authorities may influence the number of children taken into care.

Economic Factors and Child Poverty

However, the researchers emphasize that the key factor driving the increase in children in care is economics. Children from the most deprived neighborhoods are over ten times more likely to be in care compared to those from the least deprived areas. Despite efforts to address child poverty, the issue has worsened in Labour councils compared to Conservative ones.

Poverty and Child Care Placements: A Correlation

The study found that if two local authorities with similar poverty levels, income, and expenditure were compared, a Conservative council would still place over 30 more children in care than a Labour council over five years. This finding suggests that poverty alone cannot fully explain the difference in child care placements between Conservative and Labour councils.

Potential Explanations for the Disparity

Several hypotheses attempt to explain the difference between Conservative and Labour councils in child care placements. One possibility is that Conservative councils may prioritize removing children at risk rather than providing support to families to prevent or mitigate risks. Another explanation could be that Conservative councils allocate a smaller portion of their budget to family support services or fund different types of preventative services. Additionally, it is possible that Conservative councils may allocate proportionately less funding to the most deprived areas within their local authority, resulting in less support for families and children in greatest need.

Conclusion

The increase in children in care is a complex issue influenced by various factors, including poverty, political affiliation of local authorities, and potential differences in approaches to supporting families and protecting children. While the study highlights the role of local party politics, it also emphasizes the crucial need for addressing child poverty and providing adequate support to families to prevent the need for child care placements..

FAQ’s

1. What has caused the increase in children in care?

The increase in children in care is attributed to a combination of factors, including poverty, political affiliation of local authorities, and potential differences in approaches to supporting families and protecting children.

2. How does the political affiliation of local authorities affect the number of children in care?

Analysis indicates that Conservative councils tend to place more children in care compared to Labour councils of similar size, suggesting that the political affiliation of local authorities may influence the number of children taken into care.

3. What is the role of economic factors in the increase in children in care?

Economic factors, particularly child poverty, play a significant role in driving the increase in children in care. Children from the most deprived neighborhoods are over ten times more likely to be in care compared to those from the least deprived areas.

4. Is poverty the sole explanation for the difference in child care placements between Conservative and Labour councils?

No, poverty alone cannot fully explain the difference in child care placements between Conservative and Labour councils. Even when comparing two local authorities with similar poverty levels, income, and expenditure, a Conservative council would still place over 30 more children in care than a Labour council over five years.

5. What are some potential explanations for the disparity in child care placements between Conservative and Labour councils?

Several hypotheses attempt to explain the difference, including the possibility that Conservative councils may prioritize removing children at risk rather than providing support to families, allocate a smaller portion of their budget to family support services, or allocate proportionately less funding to the most deprived areas within their local authority.

Links to additional Resources:

1. www.bbc.com/news/uk-62801398 2. www.theguardian.com/society/2022/sep/15/conservative-councils-placing-more-children-in-care-than-labour-councils 3. www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/conservative-councils-children-care-labour-b2174243.html.